Mortgage & Protection Blog

  • Home /
  • Mortgage & Protection Blog

Rate cuts are a positive story for advisers

Bob Hunt

Bob Hunt

14 August 2024
In the end, the decision to cut Bank Base Rate (BBR) by the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) felt like a real surprise, even if inflation had been at target for two months and there was plenty of data to back the decision up.

Perhaps it is because we have spent so long watching BBR rise, and then be held at the 5.25% level, that a cut was always going to be a surprise when it came, even if the environment seemed right for it.

The closeness of the vote however – 5 to 4 – suggests we were right to think it was never a ‘done deal’, and looking forward, it does appear to show that we can’t necessarily think we are going to see multiple rate cuts in the manner we saw BBR raised multiple times in quick succession.

It would, for example, certainly feel like a surprise to see BBR cut again at the next meeting of the MPC, which will happen on 19th September; although if inflation remains at or below its 2% target, what arguments might be provided if the Committee doesn’t?

For those who don’t have the MPC meetings in the diary, then drop a line in for the 7th November and the 19th December, as these are the dates for the rest of 2024.

What price a pre-Christmas cut to finish the year on something of a ‘high’?

What we were already seeing just prior to the rate cut announcement, and what we have seen since, is lenders starting to react in terms of pricing.

Perhaps, not just the BBR cut or the dip in swaps, but also a reaction to business levels in the first seven months of the year, and a need to get on the front foot in terms of securing business for the rest of 2024.

Hence we did have some headline-grabbing rates, perhaps none more so than the first below 4% deal from NatWest.

A number of advisers have, perhaps understandably, raised some concerns about NatWest’s decision to only offer its 3.97% 5-year fix via its digital-only channel, asking whether this truly fits the Consumer Duty definition of providing a positive outcome to borrowers who want advice, but clearly can’t access this product as a result.

Almost immediately, HSBC undercut this rate, with its own 3.92% fix, before NatWest cut its rate again. It makes it an interesting scenario for advisers in terms of how they approach such deals, and perhaps also makes this an interesting ‘test case’ for the regulator.

I can certainly understand the frustrations advisers have with a dual-pricing approach such as we’ve seen here, especially when there has seemingly been so little of this in recent times.

It also makes me ask the question once again about how advice is valued, not just by lenders – that we might add get the vast majority of their business through advisers – but also how the regulator walks this particular line when it comes to borrowers potentially having to pay more, simply because they wanted professional advice and the protection it affords.

Let’s not forget that it’s not just the rate of a product that advisers will be considering but the overall cost including fees.

For example, in this specific case, it may well be that borrowers seeking lower loan amounts would be financially better off choosing a product with a higher rate and a lower fixed fee. But clearly, a borrower going direct without any adviser interaction is not going to be told this – which in itself makes the case for advice even more compelling.

We know the Financial Conduct Auhtority (FCA) has wanted to ensure consumers have access to mortgages through different channels. In such circumstances, though, doesn’t it feel like it is under pressure in an environment where going down one channel gives up access to such advice, and in doing so, loses access to the Ombudsman and Compensation Scheme, loses access to a channel which looks at wants and needs in the round, loses access to potentially life-changing decisions around, for example, protection needs, and loses access to other, potentially more suitable, options from other lenders or providers?

I appreciate this is a well-worn argument, but perhaps not challenged yet in a relatively new Consumer Duty environment, and one that I’m sure advisers – and their clients – would want to hear about, particularly how this pricing or distribution approach meets the higher requirements that are now expected of all within financial services.

What happens next, rate-wise, will also be of much interest to all stakeholders? Will we see a similar situation to the end of last year or start of this, with multiple and repeated changes as lenders jump over themselves? We’ve also seen some of this already.

Or will we see the real shake-up in September after the holiday season is over? Or will the big moves happen at the next BBR cut, whenever that might be?

Certainly, even without the disappointment of this dual-pricing news, rate cuts are a much more positive mortgage story for advisers to sell, particularly to clients coming up to maturity – of which there will be many in the months ahead.

Good news like cuts should not be hidden under a bushel – I expect all advisers to be leading with them as they seek to communicate by those most likely to benefit.

28 November 2024

Suppressing landlord activity won’t automatically improve first-time buyer prospects


25 November 2024

The Co-operative Bank for Intermediaries, streamlining processes and expanding product ranges


21 November 2024

Better off dead? The need for critical illness cover


18 November 2024

What the OBR’s five year forecasts mean for the market


25 October 2024

Advisers should rethink their regulatory status to keep up with sector changes


16 October 2024

Your Business Matters


7 October 2024

What may impact BTL and Resi markets in 2025?


1 October 2024

Why Gen Z could be the perfect match for protection


30 September 2024

Self-employed mortgages can be easy, if you choose the right lender


26 September 2024

Lenders and regulators must be careful not to add to adviser disillusion


19 September 2024

There may be trouble ahead…


2 September 2024

Source Go: The Modern Answer to the GI Question


29 August 2024

Pre- and post-mini Budget remortgagors need guidance in transformed market


23 August 2024

Guardian's 2023 claims report: a milestone worth celebrating


14 August 2024

Rate cuts are a positive story for advisers


1 August 2024

The mortgage market is set for a teeming H2


29 July 2024

Aldermore are backing more of your clients to go for it


22 July 2024

YOU SAID, WE DID!


12 July 2024

A surge of optimism for the market


3 July 2024

Consumer Duty one year on – what might happen next?


24 June 2024

How to increase your protection business


17 June 2024

Consumer Duty will mark new era of continuously changing advice


6 June 2024

Mental Health Matters: Workplace Wellbeing


21 May 2024

Advise or refer? Ensuring the best possible outcomes for your clients


15 May 2024

Darlington Criteria Updates


14 May 2024

And The Wait Goes On


10 May 2024

Cap on broker fees sparks industry debate


1 May 2024

Expect the unexpected


15 April 2024

Ready, set, remortgage!


12 April 2024

How the mortgage market is failing new arrivals to the UK


11 April 2024

A compliance refresh will lighten unavoidable market stress


4 April 2024

What is driving the Specialist Residential and Buy-to-Let markets this year?


4 April 2024

A Government that prioritises owner occupiers at the expense of the PRS


28 March 2024

What is your website for?


19 March 2024

Exploring the value of value added benefits


4 March 2024

Artificial intelligence – friend or foe to advisers?


9 February 2024

Trust your own gut when listening to market predictions


8 January 2024

The Name's Bond...


21 December 2023

PTs remain a big part of the marketplace


21 December 2023

Not all wine and roses but outlook is better


15 December 2023

Artificial Intelligence: A vision for the future


12 December 2023

Reflecting on 2023


11 December 2023

Mental Health Matters: Menopause


8 December 2023

Looking ahead: Reasons to be cheerful about the market in 2023


17 November 2023

Why TikTok could be a winning tactic for brokers


30 October 2023

How advisers can improve the quality metrics with insurers


27 October 2023

The Aggregator Market - Friend or Foe?


25 October 2023

Don’t let Charter support remove advice from the mortgage process


3 October 2023

How to strengthen your defences against cyber threats


29 September 2023

White Dragon Communications


8 September 2023

Advisers deserve recognition for keeping borrowers on lender books


8 September 2023

Claims history of an insurance should form core part of assessing true value of insurance and advic


4 August 2023

The blasé attitude towards sudden mortgage withdrawals is not good enough


10 July 2023

The argument for higher proc fees for better quality business is undeniable


22 June 2023

Product withdrawal timescales and how brokers can adapt


1 June 2023

We're not in mini-Budget territory yet!


24 May 2023

Skipton’s 100 per cent mortgage should be replicated, not feared


30 April 2023

Protection And Mortgage Fair Value Assessments – What Is My Actual Responsibility?


6 April 2023

Lenders will compete on mortgage rates, but don’t expect a price war


27 March 2023

Vulnerable Customers and Economic Abuse


10 March 2023

Tell borrowers to stop waiting for mortgage rates to fall


7 March 2023

Mixed messages from Bank of England boss ahead of MPC meeting


6 March 2023

Take the Consumer Duty seriously when it comes to protection


17 February 2023

Mortgage Market Update


10 February 2023

Let’s not be hasty and write off this year’s property purchase appetite


6 February 2023

Implementing Consumer Duty


9 January 2023

Why it’s so important you tell us about your vulnerable customers


5 January 2023

Why advisers are so vital in the mortgage market


Paradigm

THIS SITE IS FOR PROFESSIONAL INTERMEDIARY USE ONLY AND NOT FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

APCC MemberConsumer Duty Alliance

Paradigm Consulting is a Member of the Association of Professional Compliance Consultants and also the Consumer Duty Alliance.

Paradigm Consulting is a trading name of Paradigm Partners Ltd
Office address: Paradigm Partners Ltd, Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Partners Ltd is registered in England and Wales. No.09902499. Registered Office: As above

Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: 1310 Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7YB
Registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.

Paradigm Protect is a trading name of Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: 1310 Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7YB
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.