Mortgage & Protection Blog

  • Home /
  • Mortgage & Protection Blog

There may be trouble ahead…

Bob Hunt

Bob Hunt

19 September 2024
With every passing year it would appear advisers continue to tighten their grip in terms of their distribution prominence, with IMLA suggesting that it is not inconceivable that 85% to 90% of all mortgage business now comes through the intermediary channel.

There is much to be positive about in that statistic, not least the focus existing and would-be borrowers obviously place securing advice, the service and outcome they get, and, no doubt, the protections they are afforded by using an adviser rather than going direct.

However, at the same time, we have to marry up the customers seen with the commercial imperative that is always in place for advisory firms, not least when you consider the prominence of product transfers (PT) in our market and the sharp drop-off we see in terms of procuration fee payment for the vast majority of this business.

You may have thought if you are an adviser having a bad day, ‘This job would be great without lenders’, and equally I am sure some lenders may feel when their service levels are under pressure this market would be great without advisers.

But it’s a partnership that needs each other even if at times we are ‘uneasy bedfellows’.

Both lenders and brokers are I am sure in agreement it’s great and good for the advice community to be responsible for eight or nine out of 10 mortgages sold in the country, however we must also focus on the income being derived from that business.

And, unfortunately, according to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) own retail intermediary market data for last year, the commission earned by advisers from mortgage business has dropped by quite a considerable amount – down from £1.23bn in 2022 to £1.06bn in 2023.

At the same time – and we must conclude these facts are related – this level of income earned was across 4,104 firms last year, also down compared to 4,277 in the 2022.

That’s a drop of 174 firms, and if we take an average of three advisers per firm that’s potentially 519 advisers who have left the industry.

So if the market picks up next year, as it is expected to do so, is the market potentially running into trouble by not addressing this issue where customers may not be able to get access to advice simply because of a lack of advisers.

We have seen this in the wealth management space – a recent study by Royal London reported around 39 million adults fall into this particular advice gap.

We should probably add in another aspect to this, the disconnect between the procuration fee paid by lenders to different adviser distribution channels, and the fact there is often no equilibrium between mortgage distributors/clubs like ourselves and the networks.

This, despite the fact that lenders will of course have all the management information they need to make decisions based on the quality of the business they receive, the ease with which it moves through the pipes, its ‘stickability’ for example.

And yet still many continue to plough a historic furrow, paying networks a higher proc fee despite often being presented evidence to why parity should be the norm.

Often the criticism for not sharing such data is that advisers are promiscuous; they move from club to club; and thus it’s difficult to align the lenders’ data.

It’s an interesting comment but do advisers in networks also not move around? I would suggest that such promiscuity is small given the rebate model is entrenched in the Directly Authoristed (DA) space, (invented by Paradigm of course), and if lenders stopped offering exclusives per club then such movement would be even more miniscule.

Also, despite the fact that some lenders seem to have little problem paying networks and distributors/clubs the same, lower, procuration fee for PT business yet not for new. Go figure on that one.

Ultimately, it leaves advisory firms with a significant income challenge to overcome, particularly if – as predicted – the level of PT business continues to hold firm, or as expected in 2025 grow appreciably.

I understand from a lender’s perspective asking your CFO to increase the procuration fee budget could be a difficult sell currently; after all you are retaining existing business, it could theoretically be done by the lender and there is no guarantee you will increase your new business lending as a result.

But if your agency base is diminished, your new business will be under strain and lenders do not have the capacity, capability or desire to pick up this ‘slack’.

I am therefore convinced any lender that moves will realise the ‘halo’ effect and thus grow and retain their book at the same time.

It would be great to hear from IMLA and AMI in this regard; they are unquestionably quiet on this subject and perhaps a joint initiative could be looked at for the greater market good regardless of whether you are an Appointed Representative (AR) or DA.

Of course, advisers and firms do not, and should not, be passive watchers in terms of what is happening in the mortgage market place.

They have a series of options available to them, not least the ability to move clients to a different lender, if appropriate, and secure the full remortgage proc fee rather than the lesser PT one.

In a falling interest rate environment – as I hope we are now seeing – this opportunity becomes ever stronger, whereby existing borrowers (and their advisers) do not have to simply accept the existing lender’s PT offer in order to meet affordability and secure ongoing finance.

Instead, as we know, not only can a remortgage bring in that higher income for advisers, but with remortgaging clients the ability to look at other product/service options and needs is higher because the communication and interaction is that much stronger than with a PT.

A full financial review is much easier with a remortgaging client than those simply opting to rollover into another deal from the existing lender.

So, while we will continue to push back against the lack of proc fee parity in PT and remortgage business, and the lack of parity between club and network, advisers can effectively vote with their feet here, making sure they are not only doing right by the client but also ensuring they continue to secure the income they need and do right by themselves.

Although with few signs of a lending community wanting to change, the movement has to come from advisers and firms themselves.

Make the most of the high value consumers put on advice, the client engagement that generates and current falling rates to ensure the message is heard loud and clear, and that you secure the level of payment that should be commensurate with the work you carry out, and the risks you are taking.

28 November 2024

Suppressing landlord activity won’t automatically improve first-time buyer prospects


25 November 2024

The Co-operative Bank for Intermediaries, streamlining processes and expanding product ranges


21 November 2024

Better off dead? The need for critical illness cover


18 November 2024

What the OBR’s five year forecasts mean for the market


25 October 2024

Advisers should rethink their regulatory status to keep up with sector changes


16 October 2024

Your Business Matters


7 October 2024

What may impact BTL and Resi markets in 2025?


1 October 2024

Why Gen Z could be the perfect match for protection


30 September 2024

Self-employed mortgages can be easy, if you choose the right lender


26 September 2024

Lenders and regulators must be careful not to add to adviser disillusion


19 September 2024

There may be trouble ahead…


2 September 2024

Source Go: The Modern Answer to the GI Question


29 August 2024

Pre- and post-mini Budget remortgagors need guidance in transformed market


23 August 2024

Guardian's 2023 claims report: a milestone worth celebrating


14 August 2024

Rate cuts are a positive story for advisers


1 August 2024

The mortgage market is set for a teeming H2


29 July 2024

Aldermore are backing more of your clients to go for it


22 July 2024

YOU SAID, WE DID!


12 July 2024

A surge of optimism for the market


3 July 2024

Consumer Duty one year on – what might happen next?


24 June 2024

How to increase your protection business


17 June 2024

Consumer Duty will mark new era of continuously changing advice


6 June 2024

Mental Health Matters: Workplace Wellbeing


21 May 2024

Advise or refer? Ensuring the best possible outcomes for your clients


15 May 2024

Darlington Criteria Updates


14 May 2024

And The Wait Goes On


10 May 2024

Cap on broker fees sparks industry debate


1 May 2024

Expect the unexpected


15 April 2024

Ready, set, remortgage!


12 April 2024

How the mortgage market is failing new arrivals to the UK


11 April 2024

A compliance refresh will lighten unavoidable market stress


4 April 2024

What is driving the Specialist Residential and Buy-to-Let markets this year?


4 April 2024

A Government that prioritises owner occupiers at the expense of the PRS


28 March 2024

What is your website for?


19 March 2024

Exploring the value of value added benefits


4 March 2024

Artificial intelligence – friend or foe to advisers?


9 February 2024

Trust your own gut when listening to market predictions


8 January 2024

The Name's Bond...


21 December 2023

PTs remain a big part of the marketplace


21 December 2023

Not all wine and roses but outlook is better


15 December 2023

Artificial Intelligence: A vision for the future


12 December 2023

Reflecting on 2023


11 December 2023

Mental Health Matters: Menopause


8 December 2023

Looking ahead: Reasons to be cheerful about the market in 2023


17 November 2023

Why TikTok could be a winning tactic for brokers


30 October 2023

How advisers can improve the quality metrics with insurers


27 October 2023

The Aggregator Market - Friend or Foe?


25 October 2023

Don’t let Charter support remove advice from the mortgage process


3 October 2023

How to strengthen your defences against cyber threats


29 September 2023

White Dragon Communications


8 September 2023

Advisers deserve recognition for keeping borrowers on lender books


8 September 2023

Claims history of an insurance should form core part of assessing true value of insurance and advic


4 August 2023

The blasé attitude towards sudden mortgage withdrawals is not good enough


10 July 2023

The argument for higher proc fees for better quality business is undeniable


22 June 2023

Product withdrawal timescales and how brokers can adapt


1 June 2023

We're not in mini-Budget territory yet!


24 May 2023

Skipton’s 100 per cent mortgage should be replicated, not feared


30 April 2023

Protection And Mortgage Fair Value Assessments – What Is My Actual Responsibility?


6 April 2023

Lenders will compete on mortgage rates, but don’t expect a price war


27 March 2023

Vulnerable Customers and Economic Abuse


10 March 2023

Tell borrowers to stop waiting for mortgage rates to fall


7 March 2023

Mixed messages from Bank of England boss ahead of MPC meeting


6 March 2023

Take the Consumer Duty seriously when it comes to protection


17 February 2023

Mortgage Market Update


10 February 2023

Let’s not be hasty and write off this year’s property purchase appetite


6 February 2023

Implementing Consumer Duty


9 January 2023

Why it’s so important you tell us about your vulnerable customers


5 January 2023

Why advisers are so vital in the mortgage market


Paradigm

THIS SITE IS FOR PROFESSIONAL INTERMEDIARY USE ONLY AND NOT FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

APCC MemberConsumer Duty Alliance

Paradigm Consulting is a Member of the Association of Professional Compliance Consultants and also the Consumer Duty Alliance.

Paradigm Consulting is a trading name of Paradigm Partners Ltd
Office address: Paradigm Partners Ltd, Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Partners Ltd is registered in England and Wales. No.09902499. Registered Office: As above

Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: 1310 Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7YB
Registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.

Paradigm Protect is a trading name of Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: 1310 Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7YB
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.