Blog

How advisers can improve the quality metrics with insurers

Mike Allison

Mike Allison

30 October 2023
Much of what we do in our daily lives is under scrutiny nowadays from ‘ratings’ for credit to ‘ratings’ for how we behave in taxis when we travel with Uber. This can ultimately have consequences moving forwards on our ability to access various services.

If we take that in to our business dealings in the world of advising, whether we like it or not, we are under scrutiny too.

For some time insurers have been collating data on the ‘quality’ of the protection cases we write – and of course this is commonplace in the mortgage lending world too, with the ultimate sanction in some instances being unable to access products for clients.

Since the introduction of Consumer Duty, more focus has been placed on quality of distribution and most firms will have some sort of ‘rating’ by providers on how they are performing against their peers across a set of quality measures. The scores can be used by providers to ultimately decide whether they wish to deal with advisers or not.

Consumer Duty brought a greater scrutiny on insurers to make sure they were aware of the quality of advisers who are distributing their products. Ultimately, they are ‘on the hook’ too if misdemeanours come to light.

In the past the focus has been more on lapses or cancellations and that has been the key measure.

Now things are changing, and with the principle of the avoidance of foreseeable harm to clients under the Consumer Duty, much of the scrutiny is falling on underwriting and the responses of clients to health questions affecting underwriting decisions.

There is little doubt the industry wants to clear up many of the misconceptions that exist on claims payouts because Joe Public still thinks insurers don’t ‘pay out’ at claim stage. While this is something of a myth in the Life, CI and IP world, the reality is that some claims still do not get paid because of what insurers generally refer to as ‘misrepresentation’ on application forms.

As claims scrutiny becomes more focused on this area we need to ensure all possible steps are taken to ensure misrepresentation does not occur, so at claim the surety of payout is there.

There are a couple of steps that can be taken to try to avoid this. The first, and probably the most straightforward, is encouraging clients to read through the application questions carefully and their responses to those questions before sending them to insurers. This sounds like ‘meat and drink’ to most advisers but believe me I have seen stats to the contrary.

As you know many insurers now contact clients post-sale and ask for confirmation of answers and some go further by sampling GP data.

One further step is to tell clients this is going to happen and to encourage them to respond to insurers. This will have a positive effect on your own CYD (confirm your details) scores with insurers.

The other step is probably a little more time-consuming and involves the improvement of soft skills in questioning techniques. There is little doubt that by drawing out better responses from clients when looking at health questions, the more accurate those responses will be thereby leading to less chance of misrepresentation.

In light of this, the question is, ‘Should advisers change their approach to soft skills during the protection conversation?’ – especially when it comes to the awkward underwriting questions.

Perhaps by putting protection in front of people in a different way, so they see more value in it. By focusing on getting the answers correct you can pretty much ensure that in the event of a claim the policy will pay out and allay any fears that it will not.

If the old adage of ‘what gets measured, gets done’ is applied then clients will more than likely open up and give the correct answers to the questions.

At Paradigm we recently held some soft skills workshops in conjunction with AVIVA and they were so well received we are now taking the recordings and turning them into learning material for new advisers and for those who either haven’t sold protection for a while, or for those who wish to look at a different approach.

Ultimately using soft skills questioning techniques doesn’t need to stop at underwriting – by broadening the subject of protection, by talking about income security and financial resilience, clients may see more value in purchasing it – something we are all working towards.

If clients do want to misrepresent their questions you are never going to stop them; but by explaining the value in getting the right answers it will not only help them but you as advisers. This is because insurers will no doubt continue to use quality measures as a tool to help themselves distinguish the quality of one firm from another.

In future, insurers could use the scores they collate for decisions on levels of commissions paid or indeed pricing for clients but for now getting it right means peace of mind all round.
 

Reading this blog counts towards your CPD!

Click here to add this session to your Paradigm CPD log.


11 November 2024

Exploring the latest in Defaqto Engage: A comprehensive roundup of new features and enhancements.


25 October 2024

Advisers should rethink their regulatory status to keep up with sector changes


16 October 2024

Your Business Matters


7 October 2024

What may impact BTL and Resi markets in 2025?


1 October 2024

Why Gen Z could be the perfect match for protection


30 September 2024

Self-employed mortgages can be easy, if you choose the right lender


26 September 2024

Lenders and regulators must be careful not to add to adviser disillusion


19 September 2024

There may be trouble ahead…


2 September 2024

Source Go: The Modern Answer to the GI Question


29 August 2024

Pre- and post-mini Budget remortgagors need guidance in transformed market


23 August 2024

Guardian's 2023 claims report: a milestone worth celebrating


14 August 2024

Rate cuts are a positive story for advisers


7 August 2024

Mind the gap (s)...


1 August 2024

The mortgage market is set for a teeming H2


29 July 2024

Aldermore are backing more of your clients to go for it


22 July 2024

YOU SAID, WE DID!


12 July 2024

A surge of optimism for the market


9 July 2024

Distribution of Wealth


3 July 2024

Consumer Duty one year on – what might happen next?


24 June 2024

How to increase your protection business


17 June 2024

Consumer Duty will mark new era of continuously changing advice


6 June 2024

Mental Health Matters: Workplace Wellbeing


21 May 2024

Advise or refer? Ensuring the best possible outcomes for your clients


15 May 2024

Darlington Criteria Updates


14 May 2024

And The Wait Goes On


10 May 2024

Cap on broker fees sparks industry debate


1 May 2024

Expect the unexpected


15 April 2024

Ready, set, remortgage!


12 April 2024

How the mortgage market is failing new arrivals to the UK


11 April 2024

A compliance refresh will lighten unavoidable market stress


4 April 2024

What is driving the Specialist Residential and Buy-to-Let markets this year?


4 April 2024

A Government that prioritises owner occupiers at the expense of the PRS


28 March 2024

What is your website for?


19 March 2024

Exploring the value of value added benefits


4 March 2024

Artificial intelligence – friend or foe to advisers?


21 February 2024

RESTRICTIONS LIFTED?


9 February 2024

Trust your own gut when listening to market predictions


7 February 2024

Strategic thinking - Is this time for a new look at how we work as a business?


8 January 2024

The Name's Bond...


21 December 2023

PTs remain a big part of the marketplace


21 December 2023

Not all wine and roses but outlook is better


15 December 2023

Artificial Intelligence: A vision for the future


12 December 2023

Reflecting on 2023


11 December 2023

Mental Health Matters: Menopause


8 December 2023

Looking ahead: Reasons to be cheerful about the market in 2023


17 November 2023

Why TikTok could be a winning tactic for brokers


30 October 2023

How advisers can improve the quality metrics with insurers


27 October 2023

The Aggregator Market - Friend or Foe?


25 October 2023

Don’t let Charter support remove advice from the mortgage process


3 October 2023

How to strengthen your defences against cyber threats


29 September 2023

White Dragon Communications


8 September 2023

Advisers deserve recognition for keeping borrowers on lender books


8 September 2023

Claims history of an insurance should form core part of assessing true value of insurance and advic


23 August 2023

The good, the bad & the ugly of using Artificial Intelligence (AI)


14 August 2023

Accessibility in your marketing


14 August 2023

Choosing the right social media platform for you


7 August 2023

Staying safe online


4 August 2023

The blasé attitude towards sudden mortgage withdrawals is not good enough


1 August 2023

Is your content compliant?


10 July 2023

The argument for higher proc fees for better quality business is undeniable


22 June 2023

Product withdrawal timescales and how brokers can adapt


1 June 2023

We're not in mini-Budget territory yet!


24 May 2023

Skipton’s 100 per cent mortgage should be replicated, not feared


30 April 2023

Protection And Mortgage Fair Value Assessments – What Is My Actual Responsibility?


6 April 2023

Lenders will compete on mortgage rates, but don’t expect a price war


27 March 2023

Vulnerable Customers and Economic Abuse


10 March 2023

Tell borrowers to stop waiting for mortgage rates to fall


7 March 2023

Mixed messages from Bank of England boss ahead of MPC meeting


6 March 2023

Take the Consumer Duty seriously when it comes to protection


17 February 2023

Mortgage Market Update


10 February 2023

Let’s not be hasty and write off this year’s property purchase appetite


6 February 2023

Implementing Consumer Duty


9 January 2023

Income Drawdown – moving with the times


9 January 2023

Why it’s so important you tell us about your vulnerable customers


5 January 2023

Why advisers are so vital in the mortgage market


Paradigm

THIS SITE IS FOR PROFESSIONAL INTERMEDIARY USE ONLY AND NOT FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

APCC MemberConsumer Duty Alliance

Paradigm Consulting is a Member of the Association of Professional Compliance Consultants and also the Consumer Duty Alliance.

Paradigm Consulting is a trading name of Paradigm Partners Ltd
Office address: Paradigm Partners Ltd, Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Partners Ltd is registered in England and Wales. No.09902499. Registered Office: As above

Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: 1310 Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7YB
Registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.

Paradigm Protect is a trading name of Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: 1310 Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7YB
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.