Blog

Make stamp duty work for everyone

Bob Hunt

Bob Hunt

8 October 2021
With the government taking a record-breaking £1.3bn in stamp duty in July, should the ‘holiday’ be all year round?

As we approach the end of September and the final throes of the (partial) stamp duty holiday, there is bound to be plenty of soul searching throughout the industry on what is now the best way forward.

Of course, after this part of the holiday ends, the tax will return to its pre-8 July 2020 levels. In England — for main residences, at least — it means the zero rate returns to below £125,000, the 2% rate to between that figure and £250,000, and the 5% rate to above £250,000 and up to £925,000. Those purchasing an additional property can add an extra 3% to that.

It seems rather obvious to suggest that the number of purchases will dip as a result of that return to ‘normality’, and more buyers will need to factor in much larger stamp duty costs when weighing up their purchase decisions.

In August, the Halifax deemed the average house price to be more than £261,000; Nationwide said it was lower, at around £244,000; and the Office for National Statistics put it at £266,000. You don’t need me to tell you that, on average, UK homeowners are going to be paying at least 5% stamp duty on their purchases.

Where next?

What could, or rather should, happen next? Well, first, let’s highlight how the government made £1.3bn in stamp duty land tax alone in July. There is a 14-day window in which to pay and, clearly, after the large number of June transactions, it was always going to be high.

But that figure is a record and it is based on a holiday period where purchasers paid zero stamp duty up to £500,000. Buyers of additional properties had to pay just the extra charge. But look at what it delivered for the government in terms of tax take.

Of course, there is a good argument to suggest the numbers of transactions generated by the holiday might not be sustainable if it was made permanent. But there is also a good argument to suggest this kind of stimulus would continue to fuel interest and activity, and transaction numbers would be lifted as a result.

Where might the money that would have gone on stamp duty be spent? How might the wider economy benefit? And, lest we forget, the government stamp duty take — given what house prices are doing — could also continue to run at levels that make such a decision to permanently introduce a ‘holiday’ even more attractive.

Caveat

There is, however, a caveat — one highlighted by a recent report commissioned by the Family Building Society, entitled, ‘Lessons from the Stamp Duty Holiday’. This is the ongoing impact on prices, the inflation it may be generating, and the significant issues this presents for buyers. Did the stamp duty saving merely inflate offers for properties — pricing first-time buyers (FTBs) in particular out of the market even further?

Making stamp duty zero for all FTBs regardless of the property price is one option that probably should be brought in but, even so, the assessment of what may happen to house prices is undoubtedly relevant.

However, to what extent are those rises a result of supply-side issues rather than just stamp duty holidays? Fundamentally, it is the lack of supply that drives up prices, not a tax break that is a much smaller percentage of the cost of buying a home. Certainly a permanent stamp duty holiday makes much more sense in an environment where we are hitting our housing supply targets, but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t happen before those targets are hit.

Stamp duty is unlikely to go away. Those calling for its abolition are probably shouting into a hurricane. But there are ways to make it work for all — to incentivise the market and deliver a fair tax take for the government. The evidence of the past 14 months perhaps gives even greater momentum to a permanent holiday.
 

Reading this blog counts towards your CPD!

Click here to add this session to your Paradigm CPD log.


2 December 2021

Cyber crime update and reporting requirements


9 November 2021

Who will buy...?


1 November 2021

FCA: Remote working expectations for firms


18 October 2021

Remortgaging: Timing may not even matter this time


8 October 2021

Make stamp duty work for everyone


4 October 2021

Time to talk


1 October 2021

The FCA’s plans to tackle investment harm


27 September 2021

Lack of housing stock means brokers need to work client banks harder


3 September 2021

Let technology do the work in the fast-paced mortgage environment


2 September 2021

Time of new beginnings


18 August 2021

The proof of the pudding


12 August 2021

FCA pension transfer advice: don’t be confused by the label


12 August 2021

Time for a change?


26 July 2021

The engagement conundrum


26 July 2021

"I can’t do it all"


7 July 2021

Paused for breath


6 July 2021

SMCR part two - conduct questions


28 June 2021

Introducing a new us!


17 June 2021

Patches - what are they and why are they so important


17 June 2021

Multi-factor authentication - the simple solution


8 June 2021

SMCR part one - time to take stock


27 May 2021

A reminder of the 'good old bad old' days of protection tech


18 May 2021

Let's not consider any 'reduction' in these as some sort of victory


5 May 2021

Simple methods-calculating client profitability


30 April 2021

If the pandemic has been the mother of invention, it's time to carry on


22 April 2021

Opportunities abound in the market


19 April 2021

Early Movers are Shaping the 95% LTV Market


13 April 2021

Here's a conundrum


8 April 2021

Advice processes for vulnerable clients


29 March 2021

Vulnerable signs for advice firms to watch out for


5 March 2021

Lenders have not got to grips with how the pandemic impacted borrowers


2 March 2021

How Covid has changed our financial lives


2 March 2021

Supply needs to match demand


19 February 2021

Don't overlook product transfers


16 February 2021

Creating a plan for good CPD


5 February 2021

Stamp duty debate a black hole


2 February 2021

Industry wide levy is a head scratcher


29 January 2021

Long-term imposter product may finally become relevant as a high LTV option


27 January 2021

How to deal with a subject access request


12 January 2021

What we've learned from the FCA's advice reviews


7 January 2021

Uncertainty continues into 2021


Paradigm

THIS SITE IS FOR PROFESSIONAL INTERMEDIARY USE ONLY AND NOT FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

APCC Member
Paradigm Consulting is a Member of the Association of Professional Compliance Consultants

Paradigm Consulting is a trading name of Paradigm Partners Ltd
Office address: Paradigm Partners Ltd, Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Partners Ltd is registered in England and Wales. No.09902499. Registered Office: As above

Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: Wellington House, Starley Way, Birmingham International Park, Solihull, B37 7HB
Registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.

Paradigm Protect is a trading name of Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: Wellington House, Starley Way, Birmingham International Park, Solihull, B37 7HB
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.