Blog

The Consumer Duty is still an agenda item for 2022

Mike Allison

Mike Allison

27 September 2022

So, we have now had the final rules from the FCA regarding the implementation of its Consumer Duty. There were few surprises in the body of the rules in terms of wording, although there are some slight changes, however they do not take away from the intent in any way.

Probably the most unexpected change is the requirement for each firm to have a ‘plan’ or ‘report’ - the first of which is required by the end of October 2022.

This report is required to detail pretty much every aspect of what the firm is doing to implement the culture change required in many instances to focus more on outcomes than following specific sets of rules.

We also know from the previous papers that firms are required to undertake at least a review annually and an assessment as to how they are getting on with the Consumer Duty. It’s interesting in the final rules that this ‘review and assessment’ is now referred to as a report and that firms can expect to be asked by the FCA for that report along with ‘Management Information that sits behind it’.

So, what should the report include and what MI may be required?

The Report will require the Board, or equivalent governing body, to review and approve an assessment of whether the firm is delivering good outcomes for its customers which are consistent with the Duty. This assessment must include many aspects such as:

  • The results of the monitoring that the firm has undertaken to assess whether products and services are delivering expected outcomes in line with the Duty, any evidence of poor outcomes, including whether any group of customers is receiving worse outcomes compared to another group, and an evaluation of the impact and the root cause.

  • An overview of the actions taken to address any risks or issues.

  • How the firm’s future business strategy is consistent with acting to deliver good outcomes under the Duty.

Before signing off the assessment, the Board or equivalent should agree the action required to address any identified risks, or any action required to address poor outcomes experienced by customers and agree whether any changes to the firm’s future business strategy are required. Clearly this means the firm must:

  • Identify and manage any risks to good outcomes for customers.

  • Spot where customers are getting poor outcomes and understand the root cause.

  • Have processes in place to adapt and change products and services, or policies and practices, to address any risks or issues as appropriate.

  • Be able to demonstrate how they have identified and addressed issues leading to poor outcomes.

As an integral part of the process firms must start to collect MI in a way they possibly haven’t done previously. Some of the MI will be available via insurers, but I wouldn’t be sure that each provider would be in a position to give some of it to all advisers by the deadline.

Some such as persistency and customer retention may be instantly available to the firm but more ‘in-depth’ analysis of say details of why customers leave will be more difficult, albeit it may be an indicator to flag where customer treatment is contributing to high customer drop-off rates.

The following is by no means an exhaustive list, but it gives a flavour for how firms will start to use MI to measure outcomes, which is not the easiest thing to do:

  • Distribution of products/pricing and fees and charges: reviews of whether certain groups of customers are more likely to buy certain products, incur particular fees and charges, or appear to be receiving outcomes that are not as good as other groups of customers.

  • Training and competence records: analysis of records of staff training, including remedial actions where staff knowledge or actions were found to be below expectations.

  • File reviews: reviewing customer files and monitoring calls to check for errors and assess if customers received good outcomes.

  • Feedback from other parties in the distribution chain such as manufacturers and distributors sharing information about the way in which products are sold, and the extent to which actual sales matched the target market.

  • Allowing staff to feed-back honestly when they think products or services, or the processes used to deliver them, could be improved.

It is reasonable to think all firms won’t be expected to collect all this information, it has to be relevant and proportionate to them. Each report will be totally bespoke and will be up to the management to decide what is needed.

The key will be getting as much available data to assess whether certain groups of consumers, for example those with characteristics of vulnerability, are receiving any worse outcomes.

Earlier comments around the Duty requirements suggested it would be ‘TCF on steroids’ however in reality the requirement goes beyond this.

There is no longer a ‘tick box’ approach that is required to demonstrate that customer outcomes are paramount, which makes the approach difficult to manage and definitely creates a significant amount of work at least at the outset when starting this journey.

Other core areas of the outcomes approach have been mentioned in this column previously included the implications of price and value on protection clients which shows how many aspects there are to this.

I will finish by saying that Paradigm Consulting have and are continuing to support DA firms in preparing for the changes and there is a huge amount of information available on the Paradigm Protect website for those looking for a steer. Make use of it and you should be in a strong position to start implementing these new requirements.

Reading this blog counts towards your CPD!

Click here to add this session to your Paradigm CPD log.


21 December 2023

PTs remain a big part of the marketplace


21 December 2023

Not all wine and roses but outlook is better


15 December 2023

Artificial Intelligence: A vision for the future


12 December 2023

Reflecting on 2023


11 December 2023

Mental Health Matters: Menopause


8 December 2023

Looking ahead: Reasons to be cheerful about the market in 2023


17 November 2023

Why TikTok could be a winning tactic for brokers


27 October 2023

The Aggregator Market - Friend or Foe?


25 October 2023

Don’t let Charter support remove advice from the mortgage process


3 October 2023

How to strengthen your defences against cyber threats


29 September 2023

White Dragon Communications


8 September 2023

Advisers deserve recognition for keeping borrowers on lender books


23 August 2023

The good, the bad & the ugly of using Artificial Intelligence (AI)


14 August 2023

Accessibility in your marketing


14 August 2023

Choosing the right social media platform for you


7 August 2023

Staying safe online


7 August 2023

Search engine optimisation: the process of making your site better for search engines. 


4 August 2023

The blasé attitude towards sudden mortgage withdrawals is not good enough


1 August 2023

Is your content compliant?


10 July 2023

The argument for higher proc fees for better quality business is undeniable


22 June 2023

Product withdrawal timescales and how brokers can adapt


1 June 2023

We're not in mini-Budget territory yet!


24 May 2023

Skipton’s 100 per cent mortgage should be replicated, not feared


30 April 2023

Protection And Mortgage Fair Value Assessments – What Is My Actual Responsibility?


6 April 2023

Lenders will compete on mortgage rates, but don’t expect a price war


27 March 2023

Vulnerable Customers and Economic Abuse


10 March 2023

Tell borrowers to stop waiting for mortgage rates to fall


7 March 2023

Mixed messages from Bank of England boss ahead of MPC meeting


6 March 2023

Take the Consumer Duty seriously when it comes to protection


Paradigm

THIS SITE IS FOR PROFESSIONAL INTERMEDIARY USE ONLY AND NOT FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

APCC Member
Paradigm Consulting is a Member of the Association of Professional Compliance Consultants

Paradigm Consulting is a trading name of Paradigm Partners Ltd
Office address: Paradigm Partners Ltd, Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Partners Ltd is registered in England and Wales. No.09902499. Registered Office: As above

Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: 1310 Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7YB
Registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.

Paradigm Protect is a trading name of Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP
Office address: 1310 Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham B37 7YB
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is registered in England and Wales. Company No: OC323403. Registered Office: Paradigm House, Brooke Court, Lower Meadow Road, Wilmslow, SK9 3ND
Paradigm Mortgage Services LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership.